Rugged field computing / Reference hardware
B360 G3 nominal battery energy of 62.6864 Wh provides the published hardware reference.
Reference hardware
Evidence: Manufacturer specifications and worked calculation examples.
CUMULATIVE APPLICATION BUDGET / 17 OCTOBER 2026
In the main modeled case, the defined seismic data-processing job uses 0.08617% less energy.
Related model results: D118: 4.07% longer completion; 0.8152% more energy at its worst tested condition. No winner saved energy across the required robustness cases.
Related model jobs: D118. Integration into a product remains open.
Complete bundles, comparisons and lossesWHAT THE NUMBERS MEAN
The Getac reference has 62.6864 Wh of nominal pack energy. Battery life per charge = usable energy (Wh) ÷ average input power (W). The software studies time calculation paths separately; the Getac specification supplies nominal battery capacity.
Longer field operation on the same battery, or less battery weight for the same offline jobs and operating time.
THE APPLICATION
Field-computer manufacturers and mobile engineering teams
The aim is less repeated calculation and data handling for the same offline jobs: more field time, less battery weight or lower power drawn from a vehicle.
Offline engineering workbench · Controller-code verification · Measurement planning
The possible gain comes from repeated processing that uses a meaningful share of task energy, in a workflow that can run locally.
REFERENCES & CHECKED RESULTS
| Measure | Reference or conventional method | FI result or stated assumption | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published hardware reference | Getac B360 G3: two 7.72 V, 4.060 Ah typical packs | Nominal arithmetic: 62.6864 Wh total | Nominal pack energy; the usable amount varies with operating conditions |
| Task processing | Current optimized code on the same laptop | 3.54% lower summed case-median time in a separate FI study versus the prior FI hybrid | The software study supplies context; it reports no Getac result. The 15 October independent AI accounting review found FI slower than capable conventional gmpy2 in all 26 saved first-call and warm timing groups. The separate H22 study compares 2,500 cases with the prior FI hybrid. |
SOURCES / REVIEWED 6 OCTOBER 2026
Published nominal battery ratings; the operating conditions determine the usable energy.
Saved software comparisons, including cases that ran faster and cases that slowed.
Saved sensing-energy ranges, independently checked thermal calculations and recorded software comparisons. The device calculations show energy shares, heat paths and component budgets.
